
Originariamente inviato da
CaFFeiNe666
metto il focus sullo schermo, perchè è stato discusso piu' volte
The thing that gets left out of most discussions about the RAZR’s display is that although RGBG is used,
the subpixels have a different geometry than their RGBG first and second generation (AMOLED and Super AMOLED) partners from Samsung. Previously, green subpixels were noticeably thinner than their R and B partners. In this new matrix, they’re much closer to being same size (this also applies to the Galaxy Nexus and any of the new Samsung AMOLED panels that don’t use RGB stripes). With respect to the RAZR, the combination of this more uniform subpixel geometry and higher effective resolution (qHD) at 4.3” makes RGBG PenTile nowhere near as visually noticeable as it was on phones like Galaxy S.
quindi si conferma la visione di droid-life etc, che ad occhio nudo non c'è differenza, ne' con il gs2 ne' con il galaxy nexus... e come dice nell'ultima riga, non è per nulla visibile, sia grazie alla diversa geometria dei pixel, sia per la maggior risoluzione, come lo era nel GS1...
AnandTech - Motorola Droid RAZR Review - A Better Clad Bionic
conclusione
In any other circumstance I’d recommend the RAZR for Verizon shoppers purely because it’s the best hardware out right now. As cheesy as it sounds, the Kevlar does lend the phone a unique feel, the hardware is impressively thin, and the display is no worse at color rendering than any other AMOLED panel. It just needs Android 4.0.
dopo questa recensione sono ancora piu' convinto dell'acquisto...